Calculating impact of change of a car [1]

**Calculating impact of change is the second of calculus’s two principal operations **

…the two principal symbols that are used in calculating… are:

*d*which merely means “a little bit of.”

Thus*dx*means a little bit of*.*.- ∫ which is merely a long S, and may be called (if you like) “the sum of.”

Thus ∫*dx*means the sum of all the little bits of*x…*Ordinary mathematicians call this symbol “the integral of.” Now any fool can see that if*x*is considered as made up of a lot of little bits, each of which is called*dx*, if you add them all up together you get the sum of all the*dx*‘s, (which is the same thing as the whole of*x*). The word “integral” simply means “the whole.” When you see an expression that begins with this terrifying symbol, you will henceforth know that it is put there merely to give you instructions that you are now to perform the operation (if you can) of totalling up all the little bits that are indicated by the symbols that follow. That’s all.

**Calculating impact of change means calculating a curve’s footprint **

Like every other mathematical operation, the process of differentiation may be reversed; thus, if differentiating *y = x ^{4}* gives us

*dy/dx= 4x*; if one begins with

^{3}*dy/dx = 4x*one would say that reversing the process would yield

^{3}*y = x*. But here comes in a curious point. We should get

^{4}*dy/dx = 4x*if we had begun with any of the following:

^{3}*x*, or

^{4}*x*, or

^{4}+ a*x*, or

^{4}+ c*x*with any added constant. So it is clear that in working backwards from

^{4}*dy/dx*to

*y*, one must make provision for the possibility of there being an added constant, the value of which will be undetermined until ascertained in some other way.

One use of the integral calculus is to enable us to ascertain the values of areas bounded by curves.

Let *AB*… be a curve, the equation to which is known. That is, *y* in this curve is some known function of *x*. Think of a piece of the curve from the point *P* to the point *Q*.

Let a perpendicular *PM* be dropped from *P*, and another *QN* from the point *Q*. Then call *OM = x _{1}* and O

*N = x*, and the ordinates

_{2}*PM = y*and

_{1}*QN = y*. We have thus marked out the area

_{2}*PQNM*that lies beneath the piece

*PQ*. The problem is,

*how can we calculate the value of this area*?

**Calculating impact of change one strip at a time**

The secret of solving this problem is to conceive the area as being divided up into a lot of narrow strips, each of them being of the width *dx*. The smaller we take *dx*, the more of them there will be between *x _{1}* and

*x*. Now, the whole area is clearly equal to the sum of the areas of all such strips. Our business will then be to discover an expression for the area of any one narrow strip, and to integrate it so as to add together all the strips.

_{2}Now think of any one of the strips. It will be like this: being bounded between two vertical sides, with a at bottom *dx*, and with a slightly curved sloping top.

Suppose we take its average height as being *y*; then, as its width is *dx*, its area will be *y dx*. And seeing that we may take the width as narrow as we please, if we only take it narrow enough its average height will be the same as the height at the middle of it. Now let us call the unknown value of the whole area *S*, meaning surface. The area of one strip will be simply a bit of the whole area, and may therefore be called *dS*. So we may write

area of 1 strip = *dS = y ∙ dx*.

If then we add up all the strips, we get

total area *S = ∫ dS = ∫ y dx*.

**Calculating impact of change from start to finish**

…how do you find an integral between limits, when you have got these instructions?

First, find the general integral thus:

*∫ y dx*,

and, as *y = b + ax ^{2}* is the equation to the curve…,

*∫ (b + ax ^{2}) dx*

is the general integral which we must find.

Doing the integration in question by the rule…, we get

*bx **+(a/3)x*^{3}*+ C*;

and this will be the whole area from 0 up to any value of *x* that we may assign.

Therefore, the larger area up to the superior limit *x _{2}* will be

*bx _{2} + (a/3)x_{2}^{3} + C*;

and the smaller area up to the inferior limit *x _{1}* will be

*bx _{1} + (a/3)x_{1}^{3} + C*.

Now, subtract the smaller from the larger, and we get for the area *S* the value,

area *S = b(x _{2} – x_{1}) + (a/3)( x_{2}^{3 }– x_{1}^{3}).*

This is the answer we wanted.

All integration between limits requires the difference between two values to be thus found. Also note that, in making the subtraction the added constant *C* has disappeared.

**Calculating as simple as possible and no simpler**

“Calculus made Easy” shows how… easy most of the operations of the calculus really are. The aim of this book is to enable beginners to learn its language, to acquire familiarity with its endearing simplicities, and to grasp its powerful methods of solving problems…[2]

It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience.[3]

- Keisler, H. Jerome.
*Elementary calculus: An infinitesimal approach*. Courier Corporation, 2012, p. xi. - Thompson, Silvanus Phillips.
*Calculus made easy*. 2nd ed., enlarged, MacMillan, 1914. - Einstein, Albert. “On the method of theoretical physics.”
*Philosophy of science*1.2 (1934): 163-169.